Opening a competitor's link list and thinking "we should get this one too" for every row is a tempting exercise. The trouble is that the rows are not all of the same kind. Some grew out of a friendship, some out of an award, some out of a relationship that ended ten years ago, and none of them is within your reach. Those rows are the competitor link sources that cannot be copied. This article covers how to notice them, how to screen them out with a written rule, and what is left in the way of alternative routes. Akua Adforce does not offer a competitor analysis tool; what follows is a screening method for your own worksheet. None of the alternative routes is promised to produce a link.
Competitor Link Sources That Cannot Be Copied: Which Ones Are They?
Copyability is a scale, not a verdict
Calling a source uncopyable is not a final judgment. It means the target is unrealistic under your current conditions. The same source could become reachable a year later through a partnership or an event. So grade each row on three steps instead of yes or no: reachable, takes effort, unrealistic today. The third step is what this article is about.
What to record for each competitor link
How you collect the list is outside this article; the competitor backlink analysis guide covers the gathering steps. Here we assume a list is already in front of you. Four fields per row are enough: source type, the context of the link, when it appeared, and the form of relationship between the competitor and the source. The fourth is often blank because relationships are invisible from outside. Writing "unknown" rather than leaving it empty keeps the sheet honest.
What screening does not promise
Removing the uncopyable rows does not mean copying the rest will work. Holding a link similar to a competitor's does not create the same effect, and cause and effect cannot be established from this data. Screening exists to save time, not to lift rankings.
Links Born of Personal Relationships and Awards
Traces of years-long acquaintance
A founder who has spoken to an industry editor for years may appear in what looks like an ordinary interview. Behind that line sits a history of trust that no cold email can buy. Links born of personal relationships usually attach to a particular person, period and event. If someone on the competitor's team speaks at that publication's conference every year, the source belongs in the uncopyable group.
Award, jury and list links
A winners page documents a competitor's past achievement. To appear on the same page you would have to earn the achievement; applying is not enough. Jury seats, sponsorship of an awards ceremony and category prizes work the same way: they are open only to those with a history with the organization. You can prepare for another year or another cycle, but that is building your own story, not copying a competitor's link.
Guest appearances as a possible substitute
Appearing as a speaker or guest also needs a relationship, though the door is not as narrow as an award. The piece on podcasts, webinars and guest appearances explains how that route works. Treat it not as a link to replace the competitor's but as another way to reach the same audience.
Links From a Competitor's Product or Partnership Ties
Integrations and partner pages
If a competitor has an integration with a software product, that product's integrations page may carry a link to them. The link rests on a product fact: the competitor genuinely offers the integration. If your product does not, appearing on that page is unlikely and forcing it would misrepresent you. The row gets the label "product-bound, not copyable."
Reseller, distributor and investor pages
Pages listing distributors, resellers or investors come from partnership ties as well. They display the owner's business relationships, and you cannot enter the page without forming the relationship. Forming a business relationship is a business development decision, not a link strategy, and a link count cannot be its justification. Keep these rows on the list, but do not move them to the to-do column.
Unlinked mentions are a separate possibility here
Sometimes a partnership page names the competitor without linking. That can be a cue to scan the places where your own brand is mentioned in a similar way. The guide on turning unlinked brand mentions into backlinks shows how to find your own. This is not copying the competitor's source; it makes your existing relationships visible.
Old Sources That Cannot Be Recovered
Opportunities tied to a moment
A competitor's profile may show links from a directory, a press wave or a campaign page from several years ago. That moment passed, and the source may no longer accept new material. Look at the row's date: if it is old and the site has not been updated since, the same opportunity does not exist today.
Closed, transferred and restructured sites
A site may have changed owners, been repurposed or moved its content to an archive. The source may still appear on the list, yet nobody remains to contact. When a publisher has changed hands, the nature of the source can change too, so an old row does not describe a method that works today.
Why it helps to note the unrecoverable
Do not delete the unrecoverable row; label it "historical." Labeled rows show how the competitor's profile took shape and stop the team from spending time on the same row again. Record who applied the label and when.
A hypothetical scenario: a team put ten links from a 2019 campaign page on its to-do list and spent two weeks trying to reach the page's owner, only to learn later that the page had been taken down. A "historical" label from the start would have freed that effort for other work. The label is small, but it carries the team's memory.
Closed or Invitation-Only Sources
Membership, invitation and editor-picked lists
Some sources accept no open applications: communities where only members can post, expert networks that work by invitation, or lists the editor picks personally. If a competitor sits inside such a network, the link exists because of membership. When the membership terms are public you can check whether you qualify; when they are not, mark the row closed.
How this differs from an open resource page
A closed source is different from an open resource page. The approach in building links through resource pages relies on writing to the page owner and discussing whether a suggestion fits, which means an open route exists. To see whether a competitor's link came from such a page, visit it as a reader would. If it shows a submission route or contact information, the source is open; if not, treat it as closed.
Access alone does not decide
An open source is not automatically right for you. If its topic and readers do not overlap with your audience, even a reachable source is wasted time. Keep the access status and the fit status in two separate columns.
How to Notice an Uncopyable Source
Five questions for each row
Put five questions to every row: Is the link tied to a person? To an event? To the competitor's product or contract? Is the date very old? Does the source work by invitation? A "yes" to any one makes the row a candidate for uncopyable. Two or more "yes" answers make closing the row safe. If an answer is a guess, write "guess."
The same source across several competitors
A source that appears for only one competitor may signal a special relationship. If several competitors share it, it is more likely open to the public. This comparison gives an instinct, not a measurement, but it helps when ordering the list.
Why visiting the source in person matters
Open the page behind the row. A contact form, a submission route or a line such as "this list is curated by our editors" often settles the classification. If the page does not load or has been removed, mark the row historical. Numbers in a tool export describe what that tool measured and are not Google values; opening the page takes you out of the data and into the source itself.
Alternative Route: Reaching the Same Audience Through Another Door
The competitor's audience is not the competitor's link
The readers who benefit from a competitor's award link are the people who read that publication. You may be able to reach the same people another way, such as answering an expert request a journalist has posted. The article on earning links from journalist requests covers how that route works. The aim here is contact with the audience, not capturing the competitor's link; a link may or may not result.
Finding a neighboring publication
If a source is closed, look for a neighbor: a site that serves the same sector but is run by different editors. To do that, write down which topic the competitor's source covers and who reads it, then list other publications for the same readers. Treat that list as fresh research, not as a copy of the old row.
Paid placement: knowing the boundary
A paid placement can be one way to reach an audience. According to Google's documentation, link building whose main purpose is to manipulate rankings counts as link spam, while paid links are not a violation when qualified with nofollow or sponsored. If you buy a placement, make sure the link attribute is correct; the publication decision belongs to the publisher, and no result should be expected.
Alternative Route: Strengthening Your Own Assets
The asset that attracts links
If the competitor's unreachable link comes from an award, your counterpart may be a data study, a guide or a tool you publish yourself. The breakdown in linkable asset types sorts such assets. No one can know in advance whether an asset will earn a link; what you can do is produce a resource that truly helps readers and make it visible.
Keeping existing pages current
Creating a new asset is expensive; keeping existing pages current is cheaper. Refreshing an outdated guide may help the sources already linking to it notice it and keep the page useful. That does not promise a link.
Being known as a brand is also an investment
The links a competitor earned through personal relationships are often the result of being visible, consistently, for many years. For you, that means habits such as conference talks, industry events or regular publishing. Plan those habits as recognition goals, not link goals.
Recognition also has measures other than link counts. Searches for the brand name, direct questions from event attendees, or your name appearing in a publication as an expert are signs that show up before any link does. Keeping them in a separate note lets the team answer the question "no link yet, but is it moving?" Such signs cannot promise an outcome; they only show the direction of the process.
A Screening Rule to Avoid Wasted Time
A written screening rule
To avoid arguing over every list from scratch, write a one-sentence rule: "Rows tied to a person, an event or a contract, and rows older than two years that are no longer updated, are not worked." The rule stops different team members from reaching different decisions on the same row. Adjust it to your own circumstances; this sentence is only an example.
A reason beside each screened row
Do not delete screened rows; add a one-sentence reason: "partnership-based," "historical," "invitation-only." When the row comes up again next month, the reason shortens the debate. If the rules change, screened rows can be reopened.
A hypothetical reason: "Comes from the competitor's event partnership; we do not attend that event; revisit if applications open next year." A row with no reason tends to be debated again, and the same time is spent each time.
Reading methods alongside their cost
For rows that pass the screen, you need to know how much effort each route takes. The comparison in how to get backlinks, with methods, cost and risk offers that view. Write the rule so that high-cost, low-reachability rows go to the end. A screening rule is a sorting aid, not a ban; even rows outside the rule are prioritized, and only a few are picked each month, so the team's desk holds a manageable amount of work however long the list is.
Showing Uncopyable Sources in a Report
What to tell a client or manager
The person reading a report may expect every row in the competitor's list to become a task. Showing the uncopyable rows in a separate section, with reasons, balances that expectation. A sentence such as "this many links exist, but this many are closed to us" gives a realistic picture.
Counts as well as shares
Quoting the share of uncopyable rows as a percentage is tempting, but percentages mislead in small lists. State how many rows out of how many were screened out. Counts from a third-party tool describe what that tool measured and are not a value Google uses; say so in one sentence in the report.
The language of the report
Saying "not realistic under current conditions" instead of "unreachable" leaves the door ajar. A date for re-evaluating screened rows also keeps the report alive. Avoid sentences that promise outcomes, timing or link-count targets.
Example Template: A Copyability Assessment Table (Hypothetical)
Source types, notes and decisions in this template are invented (hypothetical) and point to no real site or person. The rows show how the five-question screening rule plays out.
| Source type (hypothetical) | Tied to | Date status | Access | Decision |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry event speaker page | Person and event | Last year | By invitation | Closed, look for alternative |
| Annual award winners list | An award that was won | Two years ago | Application window exists | Note for next cycle |
| Software integration page | Competitor's product tie | Current | Requires a product | Not copyable |
| Defunct directory page | Directory owner | More than five years old | Site gone | Historical |
| Open resource list | Editor's suggestion | Current | Submission form exists | Takes effort |
When adapting the table to your worksheet, work through these steps:
- Write the source type and what it is tied to on each row.
- Confirm the date status by opening the page.
- Set access according to whether a submission route exists.
- Decide using the five-question screening rule.
- Add a one-sentence reason to every screened row.
Rows placed in the uncopyable section tend to share these traits:
- They depend on a particular person or period.
- They require the competitor's product or contract.
- The source has closed or changed hands.
- Access comes only by invitation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can every competitor link source be copied?
No. Some links come from personal relationships, awards, product integrations or a site that has since closed, and they cannot realistically be obtained under your conditions. Open sources exist as well. Grading rows as reachable, takes effort and unrealistic today directs your time to the right place.
How can you tell a source cannot be copied?
Ask five questions per row: is the link tied to a person, an event, the competitor's product or contract; is the date very old; does the source work by invitation? One yes makes the source doubtful, and two or more usually justify closing the row. Open the page and confirm it with your own eyes.
What if the link comes from a partnership?
Instead of trying to copy a partnership link, review your own genuine relationships. Look at how your brand is mentioned on pages of your existing partners, integrations or resellers. Forming a business tie just for a link is a business development decision rather than a link strategy and should be evaluated separately.
Does an alternative route bring links?
Nobody can say in advance. Answering an expert request, refreshing a guide or speaking at an event may help you reach an audience, but whether a publication links is the publisher's decision. Plan these routes as audience contact, not as a promised result.
How is a screening rule written?
In one sentence that names which rows are not worked: those tied to a person, event or contract, those older than a set age and no longer updated, and those that work by invitation. Share it with the team, write a reason beside each screened row and review the rule every quarter.
Should uncopyable sources appear in the report?
Yes, in a separate section with reasons. The reader sees that not every row in the competitor's list is a workable task, and expectations settle. Give counts rather than only percentages, label tool data as tool-specific, and add a date for re-evaluation.
Conclusion and Next Step
A competitor's list is an archive, not a roadmap. Treating every entry as a target wastes more effort than separating the ones that are truly workable for you. Once the screening rule is written down, the team stops reopening the same debate each month.
If one of the alternative routes involves a paid placement, read the listing conditions before choosing it. Akua Adforce offers neither competitor analysis nor comparison; it offers listings. The order sequence is: listing chosen, cart, payment, then seller approval and a delivery notice, with a dispute available if something is wrong. Timing, link attributes and the publication decision are set on the listing page and by the seller. To look at the options, see the backlink packages page.
Post a comment
Please log in to leave a comment. Login